πŸ“ 724 Ridge Road, Lyndhurst, NJ πŸ“ž 1-855-465-7626 ⏰ Mon–Fri: 8 AM – 6 PM

Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)

Score the 2006 Tinetti Balance and Gait Evaluation: balance out of 16, gait out of 12, total mobility score out of 28. For clinicians. Used with permission, Mary E. Tinetti, M.D.© Copyright; 2006Reviewed by Dr. Richard Holsman, PT, DPT, NCS · Last reviewed November 13, 2026

Your answers stay on your device. This tool runs only in your web browser. Nothing you enter is sent to us, saved or shared. Close the page and it’s gone.

⚠️ For clinicians. Not a self-check.

  • The POMA is given and scored by a physical therapist or trained clinician. A physical therapist interprets the result.
  • Several maneuvers (immediate standing, the sternal nudge, eyes closed, turning 360°) can cause a loss of balance. Stand close and guard the patient; use a gait belt if your setting calls for one.
  • Stop if the patient is unsafe, dizzy or in pain.

Score the 9 balance maneuvers and the 8 gait observations as you watch. Balance (out of 16), gait (out of 12) and the total mobility score (out of 28) update as you go. When you’re done, print it or save it as a PDF. It takes about 10 to 15 minutes.

Equipment and set-up

🪑 A hard, armless chair
⏱️ Stopwatch or wristwatch
📏 A 15 ft (4.57 m) walkway, or a hallway
  • Balance: “Subject is seated in a hard, armless chair. The following maneuvers are tested.”
  • Gait: “Subject stands with examiner. Walks down hallway or across room, first at his/her usual pace, then back at a ‘rapid but safe’ pace (using usual walking aid such as cane/walker).”
  • Items 8, 11 and 12 have two parts, each scored separately.

Equipment and time: Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database.

Balance (out of 16)

1. Sitting Balance
2. Arise
3. Attempts to Arise
4. Immediate Standing Balance (first 5 seconds)
5. Standing Balance
6. Nudge

Subject at maximum position with feet as close together as possible. Examiner pushes lightly on subject’s sternum with palm of hand 3 times.

7. Eyes Closed

At maximum position #6.

8. Turn 360°

Steps

Steadiness

9. Sit Down

Gait (out of 12)

10. Initiation of Gait (immediately after told ‘go’)
11. Step Length and Height (Right foot swing)

Step length

Foot clearance

12. Step Length and Height (Left foot swing)

Step length

Foot clearance

13. Step Symmetry
14. Step Continuity
15. Path

Estimated in relation to floor tiles, 12 inches wide. Observe excursion of one foot over about 10 feet of course.

16. Trunk
17. Walk Stance
Total mobility score
0 / 28
Balance 0 / 16 · Gait 0 / 120 of 20 scored

Used with permission, Mary E. Tinetti, M.D.© Copyright; 2006

This supports clinical judgment. It is not a diagnosis. A POMA score can point to fall risk, but it can’t say for sure whether a person will fall, or why. Read it together with the rest of the exam. Results should be interpreted by the treating physical therapist.

How to read the total

Higher is better (maximum 28). Many Tinetti score sheets in clinical use list these fall-risk bands. They are not printed on the 2006 form, they come from score sheets rather than a single validation study, and some sheets use slightly different bands (for example <19, 19–24 and 25–28):

Total (out of 28)Fall risk on the score sheet
18 or lessHigh
19 to 23Moderate
24 or moreLow

Research cut-offs

As listed by the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database:

GroupCut-offStudy
Older adults (residential care)Total 19; balance 10Faber et al., 2006; sensitivity 64%, specificity 66.1%
Nursing-home residents with dementiaTotal 21; balance 11Sterke et al., 2010; total: sensitivity 85%, specificity 56%
Older adults in residential careBalance 14Harada et al., 1995; sensitivity 68%, specificity 78%
Frail older day-hospital patientsTotal 11Thomas & Lane, 2005; sensitivity 83%, specificity 72%
Parkinson diseaseTotal < 20Kegelmeyer et al., 2007; sensitivity 76%, specificity 66%
Parkinson diseaseTotal 17.5; balance 11.5; gait 10.5Contreras & Grandas, 2012
Chronic strokeTotal < 20Soyuer & Öztürk, 2007; sensitivity 66%, specificity 79.2%

Meaningful change

GroupMinimal detectable change
Older adults in residential care (mean age 84.9)4.2 and 4.0 points for an individual (two raters) (Faber et al., 2006)
Inpatients after a first stroke6 points (Canbek et al., 2013)

Reference values

Ko et al. (2009), 1,000 community-dwelling Korean older adults, mean (SD): men 65–79, 26.21 (3.40); women 65–79, 25.16 (4.30); men 80+, 23.29 (6.02); women 80+, 17.20 (8.32).

Related clinician tools: Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go, Dynamic Gait Index and Functional Gait Assessment.

About this page

Reviewed by Dr. Richard Holsman, PT, DPT, NCS (Doctor of Physical Therapy; board-certified clinical specialist in neurologic physical therapy). Last reviewed: .

Who uses this tool. This is a clinician-administered test. A physical therapist (or other trained clinician) gives it, guards the patient, and interprets the result together with the rest of the exam. It is not a self-test and it does not diagnose.

Privacy. Scoring runs only in your web browser. Nothing you enter is saved, sent to us or shared.

References

  1. [I] Tinetti ME. Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment I: Tinetti Balance and Gait Evaluation. © Copyright 2006, Mary E. Tinetti, M.D. Item wording and scoring on this page are from this form, used with permission.
  2. [P] Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34(2):119-126. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x. Bibliographic record: Europe PMC 3944402.
  3. [I] Score-sheet fall-risk bands (≤18 high, 19–23 moderate, ≥24 low): Tinetti Balance Assessment Tool score sheet as distributed by the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit (simcoemuskokahealth.org PDF), and the same bands on page 4 of the University of Missouri Geriatric Assessment Tool Kit POMA sheet (copy hosted by LeadingAge Minnesota), which lists <19 / 19–24 / 25–28 on its first page.
  4. [S] Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Rehabilitation Measures Database: Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (16-item, 28-point version; equipment; MDC, cut-offs, norms; ANPT EDGE ratings).
  5. [S] Faber MJ, Bosscher RJ, van Wieringen PC. Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Phys Ther. 2006;86(7):944-954 (MDC; cut-off 19; POMA-B cut-off 10).
  6. [S] Canbek J, Fulk G, Nof L, Echternach J. Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment in people with stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013;37(1):14-19 (MDC 6 in stroke).
  7. [S] Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK. Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2007;87(10):1369-1378 (cut-off <20).
  8. [S] Contreras A, Grandas F. Risk of falls in Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional study of 160 patients. Parkinsons Dis. 2012:362572 (total 17.5, balance 11.5, gait 10.5).
  9. [S] Soyuer F, Öztürk A. The effect of spasticity, sense and walking aids in falls of people after chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(9):679-687 (cut-off <20).
  10. [S] Sterke CS, et al. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(2):254 (POMA total 21, balance 11). Harada N, et al. Phys Ther. 1995;75(6):462-469 (POMA-B 14). Thomas JI, Lane JV. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1636-1640 (frail elders, 11).
  11. [S] Ko YM, et al. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(4):738-747 (mean scores, 1,000 Korean older adults).

How references are graded. [I] the instrument or score sheet itself; [P] a primary study whose abstract or full text we read; [S] a value taken from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database summary of the cited study (we did not read that study itself); [T] a textbook or library catalog record used to confirm a citation.

Licensing. Used with permission, Mary E. Tinetti, M.D.© Copyright; 2006. The Tinetti POMA item wording and scoring are reproduced on this page with the written permission of Mary E. Tinetti, M.D., Yale School of Medicine (granted November 11, 2026, no fee). The page layout, calculator code and explanatory text are © Holsman Physical Therapy. Please obtain your own permission before reproducing the POMA elsewhere.

Review policy. Every number on this page (cut-offs, change values, norms) is taken from the sources listed above, and we leave a value out when we cannot verify it from a source we have read. We re-check each tool page at least once a year and whenever a cited source is corrected or updated. To report an error, please contact us.

Change log.

  • : Page first published (2006 POMA form, live balance/gait/total scoring, score-sheet risk bands, research cut-offs and change values).

Conflict of interest and advertising. This page is published by Holsman Physical Therapy, which provides physical therapy services. The tool is free, carries no advertising and no sponsored content, and we receive no payment from the instrument’s authors, publishers or any manufacturer. Holsman Physical Therapy is not affiliated with the authors, journals or organizations cited, and they do not endorse this website.

Common Questions

What is the Tinetti POMA?

The Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), also called the Tinetti test or Tinetti Mobility Test, is a clinician-scored test of balance and gait in older adults described by Dr. Mary E. Tinetti (J Am Geriatr Soc, 1986). The version on this page is the 2006 Tinetti Balance and Gait Evaluation: 9 balance maneuvers scored out of 16 and 8 gait observations scored out of 12, for a total out of 28.

How is the POMA scored?

Each observation is scored 0, 1 or 2 (some are 0 or 1), where 0 is the most impaired. Balance items add up to 16 and gait items to 12. The total mobility score is balance plus gait, out of 28. Higher scores mean better balance and gait.

What POMA score means fall risk?

Widely used Tinetti score sheets list 18 or less as high fall risk, 19 to 23 as moderate and 24 or more as low. These bands are not part of the 2006 form, and some sheets use slightly different bands. Research cut-offs vary by group: for example 19 in older adults (Faber et al., 2006) and under 20 in Parkinson disease (Kegelmeyer et al., 2007), as listed by the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab.

How much change in the POMA is meaningful?

In older adults living in residential care, the minimal detectable change for one person was 4.2 and 4.0 points for two raters (Faber et al., 2006). In inpatients after a first stroke it was 6 points (Canbek et al., 2013).

Who should give the POMA?

A physical therapist or other trained clinician. The patient stands, turns, is nudged and closes their eyes, so the examiner must guard closely. A physical therapist interprets the score together with the rest of the exam.

Is my information saved?

No. Everything runs in your web browser. Nothing is sent to us or stored.

Referring a Patient?

Holsman physical therapists see patients at clinics across North Jersey, the Bronx and Brooklyn, plus in-home visits.

📞 Call 1-855-465-7626