
Score all 10 walking-balance items, get the total out of 30 and compare it with published fall-risk cut-offs.
Score all 10 items from 0 to 3. The total out of 30 updates as you go. When you’re done, print it or save it as a PDF. It takes about 5 to 10 minutes for an experienced clinician and under 20 minutes for a new one.
This supports clinical judgment. It is not a diagnosis. An FGA score can point to fall risk while walking, but it can’t say for sure whether a person will fall, or why. Read it together with the rest of the exam. Results should be reviewed by the treating physical therapist.
Higher is better (maximum 30). Fall-risk cut-offs, as listed by the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database:
| Group | Cut-off | What the research found |
|---|---|---|
| Community-dwelling older adults (60–90) | ≤ 22 / 30 | Predicted falls; sensitivity 85%, specificity 86% (Wrisley & Kumar, 2010). Confirmed as a fall-risk cut-off in 135 older adults; sensitivity 0.66, specificity 0.84 (Beninato et al., 2014). |
| Community-dwelling older adults (60–90) | ≤ 20 / 30 | Predicted unexplained falls in the next 6 months; sensitivity 100%, specificity 76% (Wrisley & Kumar, 2010). |
| Parkinson disease | < 15 / 30 | Identified people with a history of falls; sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.78 (Leddy et al., 2011). Also predicted falls over the next 6 months (Duncan et al., 2012). |
| Parkinson disease (inpatients) | ≤ 18 / 30 | Identified fall risk; sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 80.0% (Yang et al., 2014). |
For Parkinson disease, predictions were better when patients were tested off medication (Foreman et al., 2011). No single fall cut-off is listed for stroke or vestibular disorders, so for those groups the tool shows the total and change values only.
| Group | Change value |
|---|---|
| Community-dwelling older adults | MCID 4 points (Beninato et al., 2014) |
| Stroke (acute and chronic) | MDC 4.2 points (Lin et al., 2010) |
| Parkinson disease | MDC 4 points (Petersen et al., 2016) |
| Vestibular disorders | MDC95 6 points (Marchetti et al., 2014) |
Walker et al. (2007), 200 community-dwelling adults without impairment:
| Age | Mean (SD) | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 40–49 | 28.9 (1.5) | 24–30 |
| 50–59 | 28.4 (1.6) | 25–30 |
| 60–69 | 27.1 (2.3) | 20–30 |
| 70–79 | 24.9 (3.6) | 16–30 |
| 80–89 | 20.8 (4.7) | 10–28 |
Instrument. Item instructions and 0–3 descriptors are from the original form: Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the Functional Gait Assessment. Phys Ther. 2004;84(10):906-918, Appendix (adapted from the Dynamic Gait Index): sralab.org (FGA appendix PDF). Administration rules (assistance, assistive devices, orthoses, guarding position, non-ambulatory baseline, partial tests): Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy, Core Measure: Functional Gait Assessment (FGA): neuropt.org (FGA core measure PDF).
Cut-offs, change values and norms. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database, Functional Gait Assessment: sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/functional-gait-assessment, citing Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Phys Ther. 2010;90(5):761-773; Beninato M, et al. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1594-1603; Leddy AL, et al. Phys Ther. 2011;91(1):102-113; Duncan RP, et al. Parkinsons Dis. 2012:237673; Yang Y, et al. Phys Ther. 2014;94(3):392-400; Foreman KB, et al. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17(3):166-171; Lin JH, et al. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2021-2025; Petersen CC, et al. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016; Marchetti GF, et al. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38:119-124; Walker ML, et al. Phys Ther. 2007;87(11):1468-1477. Core-set recommendation and MDC values: Moore JL, et al. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(3):174-220: journals.lww.com/jnpt.
Permissions. Free to use: the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy states the FGA is “open access and freely available” (neuropt.org), and the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab lists its cost as free.
Clinically reviewed by Dr. Richard Holsman, PT, DPT, NCS. Last reviewed: November 12, 2026. Holsman Physical Therapy is not affiliated with these authors, journals or organizations, and they do not endorse this website.
Next step: Holsman physical therapists see patients at clinics across North Jersey, the Bronx and Brooklyn, plus in-home visits. Refer a patient or call 1-855-465-7626.
The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) is a 10-item test of balance while walking, developed by Wrisley and colleagues (Physical Therapy, 2004) from the Dynamic Gait Index. It is one of the six measures in the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy core set for adults with neurologic conditions (Moore et al., 2018).
Each of the 10 items is scored from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal). The items are added for a total out of 30. Higher scores mean better balance while walking.
In community-dwelling older adults, a score of 22 or less out of 30 predicted falls (Wrisley and Kumar, 2010; sensitivity 85%, specificity 86%), and 20 or less predicted unexplained falls in the next 6 months. In Parkinson disease, a score under 15 identified people with a history of falls (Leddy et al., 2011). These cut-offs come from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Rehabilitation Measures Database.
In older adults the minimal clinically important difference is 4 points (Beninato et al., 2014). The minimal detectable change is 4.2 points in stroke (Lin et al., 2010), 4 points in Parkinson disease (Petersen et al., 2016) and 6 points in vestibular disorders (Marchetti et al., 2014).
A stopwatch, a 20-foot (6 m) walkway marked 12 inches (30.48 cm) wide, an obstacle 9 inches (22.86 cm) high made of two stacked shoe boxes, and a set of steps 7.75 to 9 inches high with rails on both sides. It takes about 5 to 20 minutes.
No. Everything runs in your web browser. Nothing is sent to us or stored.
Holsman physical therapists see patients at clinics across North Jersey, the Bronx and Brooklyn, plus in-home visits.
📞 Call 1-855-465-7626