
Ligament and meniscus tests: how to do them, what a positive looks like and how accurate they are.
For clinician education; special tests support but do not replace a full examination. This page is a reference for physical therapists, occupational therapists, athletic trainers, students and other clinicians. Patients with joint or spine pain should be examined by a licensed clinician.
For the ACL, the Lachman test is the best single test and a positive pivot shift is very specific. Meniscus tests are only moderately accurate, so combine them with the history.
| Test | Target condition | Sn | Sp | +LR | −LR | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lachman test | ACL rupture (pooled, 28 studies) | 85% | 94% | — | — | [1] |
| Anterior drawer test | ACL rupture, chronic (pooled) | 92% | 91% | — | — | [1] |
| Pivot shift test | ACL rupture (pooled) | 24% | 98% | — | — | [1] |
| Posterior drawer test | Chronic isolated PCL tear (clinical exam led by the posterior drawer) | 90% | 99% | — | — | [2] |
| McMurray test | Meniscal tear (pooled) (+ more below) | 70% | 71% | — | — | [3] |
| Thessaly test (20°) | Meniscal tear (pooled) | 75% | 87% | — | — | [4] |
| Joint-line tenderness | Meniscal tear (pooled) (+ more below) | 63% | 77% | — | — | [3] |
| Valgus and varus stress tests | MCL lesion, pain on valgus stress at 30° (general practice, MRI reference) | — | — | 2.3 | — | [5] |
Sn = sensitivity, Sp = specificity, LR = likelihood ratio. A dash means the source we checked did not report that value.
Each test is described in our own words. Compare with the uninvolved side and stop if the test provokes severe pain.
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL rupture (pooled, 28 studies)[1] | 85% | 94% | — | — |
| Likelihood ratios not reported in the abstract. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL rupture, chronic (pooled)[1] | 92% | 91% | — | — |
| Not accurate in acute injuries, per the same review. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACL rupture (pooled)[1] | 24% | 98% | — | — |
| Very specific in acute and chronic injuries; poor sensitivity. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic isolated PCL tear (clinical exam led by the posterior drawer)[2] | 90% | 99% | — | — |
| Accuracy of the overall exam by fellowship-trained surgeons; the posterior drawer with step-off palpation was the most accurate component. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meniscal tear (pooled)[3] | 70% | 71% | — | — |
| Meniscal tear (pooled, later review)[4] | 61% | 84% | — | — |
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meniscal tear (pooled)[4] | 75% | 87% | — | — |
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meniscal tear (pooled)[3] | 63% | 77% | — | — |
| Meniscal tear (pooled, later review)[4] | 83% | 83% | — | — |
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCL lesion, pain on valgus stress at 30° (general practice, MRI reference)[5] | — | — | 2.3 | — |
| Adding laxity at 30° and history items raised the +LR to 6.4. | ||||
Varus stress (LCL) accuracy, Apley’s test, Ege’s test, patellar apprehension, posterior sag and the Ottawa knee rule are not shown with numbers. We only show accuracy numbers we could check against the original study or review.
How we grade sources. A = systematic review or meta-analysis. B = single prospective diagnostic accuracy study. C = small, retrospective or case-control study, or a clinical prediction rule that has only been derived (not yet validated). D = expert clinical opinion (our test descriptions). Every accuracy number on this page was checked against the cited abstract or full text on November 13, 2026. If we could not check a number, we left it out and say “accuracy data not verified.”
Reviewed by Dr. Richard Holsman, PT, DPT, NCS (Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Neurologic Physical Therapy), founder of Holsman Physical Therapy. Last reviewed: November 13, 2026.
We re-check every number on this page against its source at least once a year, and sooner if a source is updated, a better study is published or a reader reports a problem. Changes are listed in the change log with the date. To report an error, contact us.
Test descriptions, steps and the accuracy summaries are original text by Holsman Physical Therapy. Accuracy values are individual numbers cited with credit to the original studies; no tables, figures or text from journals, textbooks or other websites are reproduced. Linking to a source does not imply its endorsement. Demonstration videos, when added, will be filmed by Holsman physical therapists with consenting adult models.
This page is published by Holsman Physical Therapy and Wellness, P.C., which runs outpatient and in-home therapy practices; that is our only commercial interest. The page carries no advertising, no sponsorship and no affiliate links, and we received no payment from any source for it. Holsman Physical Therapy is not affiliated with the authors or publishers cited, and they do not endorse this website.
For clinician education; special tests support but do not replace a full examination. A positive or negative test changes the probability of a condition; it does not make a diagnosis. Interpret every result with the history, the rest of the examination, imaging when indicated, and clinical judgment. Stop any test that provokes severe pain or neurological symptoms.
The Lachman test. In the Benjaminse 2006 meta-analysis its pooled sensitivity was 85% and specificity 94%. A positive pivot shift is very specific (98%) but often negative in an awake patient.
Moderate. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 70% and 71% in Hegedus 2007, and 61% and 84% in Smith 2015. Joint-line tenderness and the Thessaly test performed similarly or better in the later review.
Holsman physical therapists see patients at clinics across North Jersey, the Bronx and Brooklyn, plus in-home visits.
📞 Call 1-855-465-7626