
Fracture screening, ligament, tendon and nerve tests for the elbow, with what the research says about each.
For clinician education; special tests support but do not replace a full examination. This page is a reference for physical therapists, occupational therapists, athletic trainers, students and other clinicians. Patients with joint or spine pain should be examined by a licensed clinician.
Several elbow tests come from small single-surgeon or emergency-department studies. The elbow extension test is the best supported for ruling out a fracture after injury.
| Test | Target condition | Sn | Sp | +LR | −LR | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elbow extension test | Elbow fracture (adults and children, 1,740 patients) | 96.8% | 48.5% | — | 0.03 (adults), 0.11 (children) | [1] |
| Moving valgus stress test | Medial collateral ligament insufficiency (21 surgical patients) | 100% | 75% | — | — | [2] |
| Hook test | Complete distal biceps avulsion (45 surgical patients) | 100% | 100% | — | — | [3] |
| Cubital tunnel provocation: elbow flexion, pressure and Tinel’s | Cubital tunnel syndrome, Tinel’s sign (+ more below) | 70% | — | — | — | [4] |
| Cozen’s test | Accuracy data not verified | — | ||||
| Mill’s test | Accuracy data not verified | — | ||||
Sn = sensitivity, Sp = specificity, LR = likelihood ratio. A dash means the source we checked did not report that value.
Each test is described in our own words. Compare with the uninvolved side and stop if the test provokes severe pain.
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elbow fracture (adults and children, 1,740 patients)[1] | 96.8% | 48.5% | — | 0.03 (adults), 0.11 (children) |
| Patients who could fully extend still need follow-up if pain persists; 17 of 602 had a fracture. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medial collateral ligament insufficiency (21 surgical patients)[2] | 100% | 75% | — | — |
| Specificity based on only 4 patients without the condition. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete distal biceps avulsion (45 surgical patients)[3] | 100% | 100% | — | — |
| Single surgeon; the test was intact (though often painful) in partial tears. | ||||
| Target condition (source) | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | −LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cubital tunnel syndrome, Tinel’s sign[4] | 70% | — | — | — |
| Specificity not reported as a number; tests were rarely positive in 33 controls. | ||||
| Cubital tunnel syndrome, elbow flexion at 30 s[4] | 32% | — | — | — |
| Cubital tunnel syndrome, pressure-flexion at 30 s[4] | 91% | — | — | — |
| Most sensitive of the four tests in this study. | ||||
Also called: Resisted wrist extension test
Accuracy data not verified. We did not find a diagnostic accuracy study for this test that we could check, so we show no numbers.
Accuracy data not verified. We did not find a diagnostic accuracy study for this test that we could check, so we show no numbers.
Varus/valgus stress at 20–30°, milking maneuver and the elbow “Tinel’s” specificity are not shown with numbers. No accuracy study for Cozen’s or Mill’s test was verified. We only show accuracy numbers we could check against the original study or review.
How we grade sources. A = systematic review or meta-analysis. B = single prospective diagnostic accuracy study. C = small, retrospective or case-control study, or a clinical prediction rule that has only been derived (not yet validated). D = expert clinical opinion (our test descriptions). Every accuracy number on this page was checked against the cited abstract or full text on November 13, 2026. If we could not check a number, we left it out and say “accuracy data not verified.”
Reviewed by Dr. Richard Holsman, PT, DPT, NCS (Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Neurologic Physical Therapy), founder of Holsman Physical Therapy. Last reviewed: November 13, 2026.
We re-check every number on this page against its source at least once a year, and sooner if a source is updated, a better study is published or a reader reports a problem. Changes are listed in the change log with the date. To report an error, contact us.
Test descriptions, steps and the accuracy summaries are original text by Holsman Physical Therapy. Accuracy values are individual numbers cited with credit to the original studies; no tables, figures or text from journals, textbooks or other websites are reproduced. Linking to a source does not imply its endorsement. Demonstration videos, when added, will be filmed by Holsman physical therapists with consenting adult models.
This page is published by Holsman Physical Therapy and Wellness, P.C., which runs outpatient and in-home therapy practices; that is our only commercial interest. The page carries no advertising, no sponsorship and no affiliate links, and we received no payment from any source for it. Holsman Physical Therapy is not affiliated with the authors or publishers cited, and they do not endorse this website.
For clinician education; special tests support but do not replace a full examination. A positive or negative test changes the probability of a condition; it does not make a diagnosis. Interpret every result with the history, the rest of the examination, imaging when indicated, and clinical judgment. Stop any test that provokes severe pain or neurological symptoms.
It helps. In a study of 1,740 emergency patients, the negative likelihood ratio for full elbow extension was 0.03 in adults and 0.11 in children, but 17 of the 602 patients who could fully extend still had a fracture, so follow-up matters if pain continues.
Whether the distal biceps tendon is completely torn. If you cannot hook a finger under the tendon from the lateral side while the patient supinates, the tendon is likely avulsed. In a 45-patient surgical study it was 100% sensitive and specific.
Holsman physical therapists see patients at clinics across North Jersey, the Bronx and Brooklyn, plus in-home visits.
📞 Call 1-855-465-7626